Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commission v. Cantrell Marine, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Cantrell Marine, Inc., the appellee, sought from appellant, Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commission, a motor vehicle dealer license pursuant to Act 388 of 1975 as amended by Act 65,§7, of 1989. Cantrell Marine is a boat dealer. Cantrell Marine’s application was returned with a letter from the Commission’s Director stating, “in my opinion a marine dealer does not qualify as a Motor Vehicle Dealer, as found under A.C.A. 23-112-103(1) and (2).” The cited statutory subsections codify the Act’s definitions of “motor vehicle” and “motor vehicle dealer.”
Nothing of record suggests…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barr v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Dixie Downs, Inc. v. Arkansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- CONSUMERS CO-OP. ASS'N v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Cheney v. East Texas Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Cummings v. Big Mac Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Hankins v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Regional Care Facilities, Inc. v. Rose Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- McCullough v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.