Legal Opinion

Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commission v. Cantrell Marine, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1991No. 90-289PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Cantrell Marine, Inc., the appellee, sought from appellant, Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commission, a motor vehicle dealer license pursuant to Act 388 of 1975 as amended by Act 65,§7, of 1989. Cantrell Marine is a boat dealer. Cantrell Marine’s application was returned with a letter from the Commission’s Director stating, “in my opinion a marine dealer does not qualify as a Motor Vehicle Dealer, as found under A.C.A. 23-112-103(1) and (2).” The cited statutory subsections codify the Act’s definitions of “motor vehicle” and “motor vehicle dealer.”

Nothing of record suggests…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barr v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Dixie Downs, Inc. v. Arkansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. CONSUMERS CO-OP. ASS'N v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Cheney v. East Texas Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Cummings v. Big Mac Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Hankins v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Regional Care Facilities, Inc. v. Rose Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. McCullough v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API