Legal Opinion
Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 19, 1998No. 97-1016PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
The appellant, William G. Ford, filed a declaratory-judgment action against the appellees, the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (Commission), Ray Sebren, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of the Fiscal Division of the Commission, and Steve N. Wilson, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Commission. The trial court dismissed Ford’s action without prejudice because Ford failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We affirm.
On September 2, 1996, the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission cited Ford for possession of a quail…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Dupwe v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- State v. RainerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Francis v. FrancisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Jayel Corp. v. CochranSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.