Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Neal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1993No. 92-1108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellant, Reginald S. McCullough, is an attorney in Little Rock. One of his clients, Jacqualine Dedman, filed a complaint with the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (“Committee”), in which she asserted that Mr. McCullough had been employed by her family in January 1987 to handle the probate of her mother’s estate but had failed to follow up on any details of his work or to keep her reasonably informed as to the status of the case in probate. As of April 17, 1992, probate had not been concluded on the estate.

After reviewing Ms. Dedman’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commission v. Cantrell Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. CONSUMERS CO-OP. ASS'N v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Mays v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Nosal v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. McLane Southern, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API