Legal Opinion

Gilroy v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided June 17, 2009No. 1:07-cr-00074PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOSEPH A. DiCLERICO, JR., District Judge.

Proceeding pro se and in forma pauper-is, Rosemary A. Gilroy brings a complaint against the defendants, Ameriquest Mortgage Company (“Ameriquest”) and Ameriquest Mortgage Company Mortgage Services, Inc. (“AMC Services”), for violations of New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated (“RSA”) 358-C:3, 1(a). Specifically, Gilroy alleges that the defendants harassed her by repeatedly calling her at home regarding her delinquent mortgage payments.

The court held a bench trial on May 11, 2009. Each party submitted a set of proposed findings of fact and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Delgado-MunozCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Akalwadi v. Risk Management Alternatives, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
  5. Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Moore v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Arteaga v. Asset Acceptance, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Obenauf v. Frontier Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  5. Durthaler v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API