Legal Opinion
Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2015No. 14-4088PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Cohn, D.J.,
COHN, D.J. (pg. 527), delivered a separate concurring opinion. COOK, J. (pp. 527-29), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The named plaintiffs-appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are three individuals who purchased Align, Procter & Gamble’s (“P & G”) pro-biotic nutritional supplement, and found that the product did not work as advertised — that is, it did not promote their digestive health. Plaintiffs subsequently brought suit, alleging violations by P & G of various state unfair or deceptive practices statutes because it has not been proven scientifically…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. v. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PetrobrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. ASD Specialty Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Wilbur Macy v. GC Services Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.