Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Alliance Home Health, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 29, 2001No. 94357PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
{1 Certiorari has been granted to review whether the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to grant a motion to vacate a default judgment and entering summary judgment on that motion against the party who sought vacation. This Court holds that the motion to vacate should have been granted. The Court of Civil Appeals opinion holding to the contrary is vacated. The cause is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate the default judgment.
FACTS
{2 The Appellee, Andrew Horowitz, was employed by Alliance Home Health, Inc. (Alliance). On March 20, 1998, he filed this lawsuit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. H. Webb Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Burroughs v. Bob Martin CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Midkiff v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ultra Resources, Inc. v. McMurry Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Sublette County School District Number Nine v. McBrideWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Vannoy v. Earth Biofuels, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- ASSET ACCEPTANCE v. PHAMCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- C & L Enterprises Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.