Legal Opinion

State v. Medley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1978No. 4PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

After Willie James Meaders and Glossie Lee Carter had testified for the State, a prior statement made by each was admitted, over objection, for corroborative purposes. Defendant contends these prior statements do not corroborate the testimony of the witnesses and points to certain variances between the testimony and the prior statement of each witness. Admission of the statements for corroborative purposes constitutes defendant’s first assignment of error.

The admissibility of a prior consistent statement of a witness to corroborate his testimony is a long established rule of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SkipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. MashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API