Legal Opinion

State v. Larrimore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1995No. 241A93PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant first assigns error to the allowance of peremptory challenges to two black jurors. He contends that by the allowance of the challenges, there was impermissible racial discrimination in the selection of the jury. Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 113 L. Ed. 2d 411 (1991); Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1986). The defendant contends that his equal protection fights under the Fourteenth Amendment and his right to an impartial jury under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States were violated by the allowance of these peremptory…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. WileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. GroomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API