Legal Opinion

State v. Mash

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1988No. 728A86PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

The sole issue dispositive of this appeal is whether the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the issue of defendant’s voluntary intoxication to defendant’s prejudice. We conclude it did and order a new trial.

I

The defendant and the state agree that in a period of minutes around 11 p.m. on 5 June 1986, the defendant beat Randall Cupp to death with a car jack. State’s evidence in the guilt phase of the trial tended to show the following:

Defendant’s friends first saw him drinking beer in the driveway of his mother’s house around 4 p.m. on 5 June. They saw him…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. BrankerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. SkipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API