Legal Opinion

Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 1988No. WCB 85-12191; CA A43382PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

This case is before us after a remand to the referee for evidence taking. Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 90 Or App 450, 752 P2d 1246 (1988). The initial issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board had authority to republish its October 8, 1986, order. We conclude that the Board had that authority and that, therefore, we have jurisdiction. On the merits, we affirm the Board.

We address the jurisdiction issue first. The facts and the procedural history are in our initial opinion and need not be restated here. The evidence taken by the referee on remand about whether the Board mailed its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forney v. Western States PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Forney v. Western States PlywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Spivey v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Wilson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haskell Corp. v. FilippiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Haskell Corp. v. FilippiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API