Robertson v. Alling

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants, collectively “the Allings,” appeal from the trial court’s grant of a mo*332tion to enforce settlement in favor of Appel-lees, collectively “the Robertsons.”1 On appeal, the Allings argue that the trial court erred in concluding their attorney had authority to settle the matter, that Rule 80(d), Ariz. R. Civ. P., was inapplicable, and that material facts of the agreement were not in dispute. Because we conclude reasonable minds could differ about whether the Allings’ counsel had apparent authority to settle the case based on the undisputed facts presented, and…