Legal Opinion
Saiz v. Goodwin
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided March 5, 1971No. Civ. 8739PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MECHEM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Theresa Saiz herein has filed suit on behalf of herself, her minor child and “all others similarly situated” seeking a preliminary injunction pursuant to Section 2284(3) of Title 28 U.S.C., permanent declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to Sections 2201 and 2202 of Title 28 U.S.C. and Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has also made application for the convening of a three-judge court pursuant to Sections 2281 and 2284 of Title 28 U.S.C.
The action arises under Section 1983 of Title 42 U.S.C. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meyers v. JurasDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1971
- Saddler v. WinsteadDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1971
- Theresa Saiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Son Anthony Joseph, and All Others Similarly Situated v. M. B. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Bradford v. JurasDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1971
- Bradford v. JurasDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.