Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Juras
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 3, 1971No. Civ. 70-378PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALFRED T. GOODWIN, District J udge:
Plaintiffs, public welfare recipients, seek to enjoin the State of Oregon from enforcing a regulation which requires local welfare administrators to terminate aid to families with dependent children if mothers refuse to cooperate with law enforcement officials in obtaining financial support from nonsupporting fathers.
A three-judge court was convened because the plaintiffs seek to enjoin the enforcement of a state regulation. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4); 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The three-judge court also has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Doe v. LavineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Shirley v. LavineDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1973
- Doe v. FlowersDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1973
- Doe v. GillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Simpson v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.