Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Maume

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Currey, J.

This action was commenced on the 14th of January, 1864, to recover the amount due from the defendant Maume, on a promissory note made in 1854, and which became due in 1855, and to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate, executed to secure its payment. A judgment and decree was rendered in the case in favor of the plaintiff on the last day of May, 1864, and on the next day notice of the decision of the Court was served on the attorneys for the defendants. On the application of the defendant McMinn, the Court made an order on the 20th of June, 1864, that the time for…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. California Central RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Greer v. Los Angeles Athletic ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Saint Croix Lumber Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API