Legal Opinion
Freese v. Freese
California Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1901No. S.F. No. 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the. court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Appeal from an order denying a new trial.
It is contended by the respondent that the order must be affirmed, for the reason.that the appellant did not present the statement to the defendant’s attorney within the time allowed therefor, and that, as the judge was not authorized to settle the same, there is no record upon which the order appealed from can be considered.
The notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed and served May 5,1898. May 19th, the appellant obtained from the judge an order giving him ten days from that date within which to prepare and serve the statement. A similar…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bunnel v. StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wheeler v. KarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Sherman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Coast Electric Service, Inc. v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Colthurst v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.