Legal Opinion
People v. Nest
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1942No. Crim. A. 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VICKERS, J. pro tem.
Defendant appeals from the judg ment after conviction of violation of section 101(a) of the Unemployment Insurance Act (Stats. 1935, p. 1226, Act 8780d, Deering’s General Laws). The complaint follows the language of the statute and charges in substance that defendant did wilfully and unlawfully make a false statement and representation, and knowingly fail to disclose a material fact for the purpose of obtaining and increasing a benefit and payment to him, under the act in question, in that he certified that he was totally unemployed and partially unemployed and had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Universal Pictures Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Brainard v. BrainardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berberian v. Department of Employment Security, Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Bolles v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Siddiqi v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bartel v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Carlsen v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.