Legal Opinion

Bolles v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1960No. Docket 17, 18, Calendar 48,169, 48,170PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case 1 involves unemployment compensation. In general terms the problem is this: How can a man use bis time, when be is laid off, and still not lose bis unemployment compensation? At one extreme the problem is clear. If he goes fishing, or sits on the porch and whittles, he is safe. But if he works, a real problem arises. Let us assume he is a good lawn mower. It is argued to us that if he goes to work as an employee of a lawn mowing company, he is still safe, but that if he mows lawns on his own, he loses his compensation. The cliche is that if he is self-employed he is not unemployed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Phillips v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hubbard v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. NestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bingham v. American Screw Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cumming v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Employment Security Commission v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Gesualdi v. Board of Review of the Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  5. Hartenstein v. FLA. DEPT. OF LABOR, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API