Legal Opinion

Bartel v. Employment Security Department

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1962No. 36249PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in which the trial court, reversing a decision of the Commissioner of the Employment Security Department, held respondent to be “unemployed” within the meaning of RCW 50.04.310.

Respondent and his wife own and operate a small dairy farm in the vicinity of Everson, Washington. They own 120 acres of land, about half of which is cleared. Even the cleared portion is hilly and produces so little grass that respondent finds it necessary to buy hay for feeding his cattle eight months of the year.

At the time that this case was before the Appeal Tribunal of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Phillips v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Slocum Straw Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People v. NestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kenna v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. Cumming v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Taylor v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hartenstein v. FLA. DEPT. OF LABOR, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API