Mohwinkel v. City of North St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant City of North St. Paul appeals a district court decision which reviewed de novo a special property tax assessment against respondents, and awarded respondents’ expert fees of $1,650. Appellant asserts that the court’s review of the assessment under Minn.Stat. § 429.081 should have been deferential to the city, and that Rule 11 of the District Court Code of Rules precluded the district court’s expert witness fee awards to each of twenty-two respondents totaling $1,650. We disagree and affirm the district court.
FACTS
In 1981, the North St. Paul City Council…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Lydon v. City of North St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Dosedel v. City of Ham LakeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.