Legal Opinion
Dosedel v. City of Ham Lake
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1987No. C4-87-767PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The City of Ham Lake, Minnesota, appeals from the February 6, 1987, judgment which reversed the city’s special assessment upon respondents John F. Dosedel, et al. for road improvements and set a ceiling on the reassessment upon remand. The city contends that its assessment should have received “due judicial deference” upon review by the trial court. In addition, the city claims that the trial court improperly discarded its appraisal in favor of respondents’ assessment of the benefit to their land. Finally, the city alleges that it was prejudiced by the trial court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Appeal of Ewert v. City of WinthropSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & ExpensesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schumacher v. City of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- DeSutter v. Township of HelenaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Special Assessment Appeals of County of Ramsey v. Town of White BearCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Schumacher v. City of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988