Legal Opinion
Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 11, 1994No. C4-93-776PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
After Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. and David Quade (Quade) won a jury verdict in this negligence action, Quade moved the trial court for preverdict interest from the date of Quade’s settlement offer to the date of the verdict. Minnesota Minding & Manufacturing Company (3M) objected, arguing the interest should be calculated from the time of Quade’s offer to 3M’s counteroffer and only on the amount of its counteroffer. The trial court, after a hearing, disagreed and calculated the interest on the amount of the verdict from the time of the commencement of the action…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Striebel v. Minnesota State High School LeagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Lener v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of HastingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- County of Scott v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.