Legal Opinion

Lydon v. City of North St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1984No. C2-84-879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

North St. Paul appeals a district court decision which reviewed de novo a special property tax assessment against Lydon, a resident. North St. Paul contends that the court’s review of the assessment under Minn.Stat. § 429.081 ought to have been deferential to the city. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

In 1981, North St. Paul sét out to improve its streets and sewers. Some of the construction took place on the street adjacent to Lydon’s property. The improvements were approved in advance by city council resolution.

Following completion of the work, the North St. Paul city…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Kerrigan v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Buettner v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Mohwinkel v. City of North St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Dosedel v. City of Ham LakeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Lunderberg v. City of St. PeterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Special Assessment for Maplewood Public Project No. 78-10 v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API