Legal Opinion
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 8, 1991No. C0-90-1408PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Respondents Robert and Irene Casey brought this declaratory judgment action to determine their entitlement to underin-sured motorist benefits. On July 31, 1989, the trial court granted sun mary judgment on the question of coverage, leaving for trial a determination of Caseys’ damages. The July 31 order included an award of attorney fees in an amount to be determined after trial. A jury determined that the Caseys had suffered total damages of $236,575.92. The trial court granted attorney fees of $5,904 to Caseys. The parties were unable to agree on how a prior…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Preferred Mutual Insurance v. GamacheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SigmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Trapp v. HancuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Lessard v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Brown v. FloweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.