Legal Opinion

Aldine Press v. Estes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Clinton. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff, which is presumably a corporation, having its business office in New York, sued defendant, who was a publisher of a paper in St. Johns, for the price of 1,500 annuals or calendars for the year 1888, alleged to have been ordered in 1887. The suit was brought before a justice, and defendant prevailed. Upon appeal at the Clinton circuit, the judge who presided at the trial ordered a judgment for 896.40.

The bill of particulars filed with the justice claimed for—

“ 1,500 sheets and covers of the Aldine Press octavo annual for year 1888, as shown in order to W. W. Huntington, secretary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weiden v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Eberts v. SeloverMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. JackoboiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Capital Fertilizer Co. v. Ashcraft-Wilkinson Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. People ex rel. Cook v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. First National Bank v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API