Legal Opinion
Lovesky v. Zeligzon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 17, 1989No. 7702PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The defendant Arlette Zeligzon, wife of the defendant Rafael Zeligzon, appeals from the denial of her motion to dissolve an ex parte prejudgment attachment granted pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278e. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding that probable cause existed to support the validity of the plaintiff’s claim. We find no error.
The trial court could reasonably have found the following facts. The defendant wife, Arlette Zeligzon, is the owner of premises located at 142 Hampton Avenue, West Hartford. The defendant husband, Rafael Zeligzon, is a home…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. SheaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991