Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Shea
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 26, 1991No. 9181PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff appeals from the order of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion, filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278e (c), to dissolve an ex parte prejudgment attachment of her real estate in the amount of $9,000,000. The only significant issue1 on appeal is whether the trial court improperly found *170that the plaintiff failed to establish that probable cause existed to support the validity of the plaintiffs claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff, The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (Chase), loaned $8,275,000 to a corporation in the form of a series of bankers’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Wall v. ToomeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Anderson v. NedovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Banks v. VitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shea v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. SheaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Shea v. Chase Manhattan Bank, No. Cv 96 0149647 S (Jun. 15, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Shea v. Chase Manhattan Bank, No. Cv96 0149647 (Dec. 7, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Shea v. Chase Manhattan Bank, No. Cv96 0149647 S (Jun. 17, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997