Commonwealth v. Robertson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court being equally divided, the Order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Justice SAYLOR did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. Justice CASTILLE files an opinion in support of affirmance in which Justice NIGRO and Justice NEWMAN join. Justice CAPPY files an opinion in support of reversal in which Chief Justice FLAHERTY and Justice ZAPPALA join.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
CASTILLE, Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether the 1988 version of the Maryland crime of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) as set forth in Md.Code Transp. § 21-902(a), is an…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. WhisnantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Eck v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
4Cited by18 opinions
- Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Petrovick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. SpennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. NorthripSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.