Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1999No. Appeal 140 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1997PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The Court being equally divided, the Order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Justice SAYLOR did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. Justice CASTILLE files an opinion in support of affirmance in which Justice NIGRO and Justice NEWMAN join. Justice CAPPY files an opinion in support of reversal in which Chief Justice FLAHERTY and Justice ZAPPALA join.

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

CASTILLE, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether the 1988 version of the Maryland crime of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) as set forth in Md.Code Transp. § 21-902(a), is an…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. WhisnantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Eck v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Petrovick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. SpennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. NorthripSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API