Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Northrip

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2009No. 81 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GREENSPAN.

We permitted this appeal in order to review the Superior Court’s decision under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714, Sentences for Second and Subsequent Offenses, commonly referred to as the “Three Strikes Law.” The precise question is whether the Superior Court panel properly determined that the New York statute of Arson in the Third Degree, N.Y. Penal Law § 150.10, does not constitute an offense equivalent to the Pennsylvania statute of Arson Endangering Persons, 18 Pa. C.S. § 3301(a)(1). We conclude that the two offenses are not equivalent. As a result, we hold that the Superior…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. SamuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. WardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. BarbaroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. GreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API