Commonwealth v. Shaw
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
The issue presented in the instant appeal is whether the Superior Court properly determined that the sentencing court erred by finding that the New York State offense of Driving While Ability Impaired (“DWAI”), N.Y. Veh. & Traf, Law § 1192(1), is an “equivalent offense” to the Pennsylvania offense of Driving While Under the Influence of Alcohol (“DUI”), 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731(a)(1), for purposes of sentencing Appellee as a repeat offender pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731(e)(l)(iii). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order of the Superior Court vacating Appellee’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- In the Interest of M.W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. SpennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State v. HullSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Commonwealth v. NorthripSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.