Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, III

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2013No. 2013AP000149-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review, pursuant to SCR 22.17(2), 1 the report of the referee, Richard C. Ninneman, recommending the court suspend Attorney Walter W. Stern, Ill's license to practice law for a period of two years for professional misconduct resulting in his federal criminal conviction for conspiring to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). 2 No appeal has been filed.

¶ 2. We approve and adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law. We conclude that the seriousness of Attorney Stern's misconduct warrants a two-year license suspension. The Office of Lawyer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Benjamin A. HanesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. KranitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven T. BermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API