Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against George

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2008No. 2005AP1978-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney Gary R. George appeals a referee's recommendation that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be revoked for professional misconduct consisting of committing criminal acts that reflect adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness and fitness as a lawyer. The referee also recommends that Attorney George pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. The sole issue on appeal is the appropriate level of discipline.

¶ 2. We approve the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and we adopt them. We conclude that a lengthy suspension is the appropriate level of discipline in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ReitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. Carl A. GeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against HinnawiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. SchoeneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maria J. SchreierWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. KranitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael M. KrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API