Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven T. Berman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 2014No. 2013AP002126-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a stipulation filed pursuant to SCR 22.12 1 by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Steven T. Berman. In the stipulation, Attorney Berman agrees that by engaging in conduct leading to a criminal conviction for the felony offense of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, he violated the supreme court rules. He also agrees that a two-year suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin is an appropriate level of discipline for his misconduct. There is no request in this matter for a restitution award, nor is there a request for the imposition of costs against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings HenningsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard A. KranitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard W. VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Richard W. VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API