Legal Opinion

Brager v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

It is the first contention of the defendant upon this appeal that the evidence fails to sustain the verdict of the jury which found the motorman negligent with respect to the speed at which he operated the car. From the testimony of the conductor and motorman it appears that the car was traveling from fifty-five to sixty miles per hour. An engineer of the defendant company testified that the car under the conditions then existing had a maximum speed of fifty-seven miles per hour. The only evidence which tended to contradict this was that of one Harry Smith, who was at a point over five…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. McCarthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Watkins v. WatkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Jordan v. OsborneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Royer v. SaeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Van Dunk v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Bellrichard v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Keegan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wilmet v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Roswell v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API