Wilmet v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
Upon this appeal the assignments of error present three principal questions: (1) Was the negligence of the driver Smet the sole proximate cause of the collision? (2) If Smet’s negligence was not the sole proxi mate cause of the collision were Wilmet and Carlson guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law? And (3), Was Smet’s negligence as found by the jury greater than that of the defendant Railway Company as a matter of law ?
In considering what caused the collision it is necessary to have in mind the physical situation as disclosed by the maps and photographs. The depot is one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Brager v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Switzer v. Detroit Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by12 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. City of Fond Du Lac, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Schoendorf & SorgiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Britton v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Bosin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960
- Bellrichard v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.