Legal Opinion
Farrington v. McClellan
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 1915No. Civ. No. 1256PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The controversy here arises out of certain agreements alleged in the complaint to have been entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants whereby the latter agreed to pay the former certain compensation for negotiating the sale of certain real property situated in the city of Stockton.
Judgment was awarded the plaintiffs as against the defendant and appellant, F. E. McClellan, in the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars (the amount sued for), with interest thereon from the first day of February, 1913. Furthermore, in accordance with the prayer of the complaint based upon averments…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Knapp v. . WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Green v. CovillaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hamlin v. SchulteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Willis v. HolbackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Kaufman v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- McClellan v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917