Hamlin v. Schulte
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the decision of a former appeal in this action, reported in 31 Minn. 486, the plaintiffs amended their complaint. The defendant,, having answered, moved for judgment on the complaint and answer, which motion was granted by Young, J., and the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment so entered.
1Opinion of the CourtYanderburgh, J.
It appears by the amended complaint that the plaintiffs, real estate brokers, were employed by defendant to procure a purchaser for certain specified terms, contemplating the execution and delivery of a deed of the premises, a cash payment by the-purchaser, and security for the deferred payments. It further appears that the plaintiffs did succeed in finding a purchaser who was. ready and willing to buy the property on the proposed terms, and *535that thereupon, acting on behalf of defendant and his wife, who they assumed would join in the deed, they entered into a written contract with such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Kock v. EmmerlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Mooney v. . ElderNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Jones v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Birmingham Land & Loan Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.