Legal Opinion
McClellan v. Lewis
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 22, 1917No. Civ. No. 1713PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action is to quiet title. The claim of appellants is grounded upon the consideration that said Minnie McClellan filed a declaration of homestead upon the house and lot in controversy. Defendant relies upon a contract of sale executed by said P. E. McClellan to said Lewis, as the trustee of the Stockton Grove No. 118, United Ancient Order of Druids, and upon a final judgment in favor of said Lewis in a former action between the same parties.
The court found that on April 1, 1913, the defendant Lewis, for and on behalf of said Grove, brought an action, No. 10,741, in said superior court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Potomac Oil Co. v. DyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Copple v. AigeltingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Orange Cove Water Co. v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Wiberg v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- McClellan v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917