Legal Opinion
Jacques Krijn en Zoon v. Schrijver
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 18, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The defendant has made two motions in this matter: (1) To dismiss the action upon the ground that it appears on the face of the complaint that the court does not have jurisdiction over the parties herein or over this action and that the plaintiff does not have capacity to sue; and (2) To require the plaintiff (or plaintiffs) to file security for costs in such amount as may be fixed by the court.
The complaint alleges that at all times hereinafter mentioned the plaintiff was and still is a limited partnership (“eom-manditaire vennootschap”), duly organized and existing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Remington's Dairy v. Rutland Ry. Corp.District Court, D. Vermont · 1954
- Heiberg v. HaslerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re K-Dur Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Feldmann Insurance Agency v. BrodskyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
- Knight v. BolivarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965