Legal Opinion
Heiberg v. Hasler
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1941No. Civil Action No. 818PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
This is a defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, in a negligence cause wherein the female plaintiff, being in the defendant’s employ and acting as her personal attendant, was injured while she and her employer were traveling in the defendant’s automobile in France, on July 23, 1937.
The complaint alleges that the accident happened as the result of violations of sundry provisions of the laws of the then Republic of France; these, apparently, the defendant denies, although that is not too…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Heiberg v. HaslerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campana Corporation v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Southern Agency Co. v. LaSalle Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Jacques Krijn en Zoon v. SchrijverDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Southern Agency Company, Sterling G. Phillips, Ralph L. Markus and Thomas B. Maue v. Lasalle Casualty Company, J. S. Finke, Bess Finke, Bess Finke and Ralph Bertel, Trustees for Myrna M. Heckler D/B/A United Investment Company, Southern Agency Company, Sterling G. Phillips, Ralph L. Markus and Thomas B. Maue v. Lasalle Casualty Company, National Industries, Inc., F. G. Orner and John FahrenbachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968