Legal Opinion

Klebanow v. New York Produce Exchange

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 2, 1965No. 305, Docket 29270PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

The novel issue, crucial to decision of this appeal, is whether limited partners of a New York partnership in dissolution can sue on its behalf for damage claimed to have been inflicted on it by conduct proscribed by the federal antitrust laws, when the partnership and the liquidating partner allegedly have rendered themselves unable to sue and their delegate is claimed to be unwilling to do so because of affiliations with the defendants.

Plaintiffs were limited partners in the brokerage firm of Ira Haupt & Co., a New *296York limited partnership whose term was to end…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Meyer v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. BeauchampSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Pacific Coast Agricultural Export Ass'n v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Scott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API