Legal Opinion

In Re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 29, 2004No. CIV.A. 01-1652(JAG); MDL 1419PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENAWAY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter arises from actions brought by private litigants and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania against defendant pharmaceutical manufacturers, Schering-Plough Corp. and its subsidiary Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively “Schering”), Wyeth (f/k/a American Home Products, Inc.) and its business unit ESI Lederle (collectively “ESI”), and Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. (“Upsher”). 1 The Judi cial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has transferred these cases to this Court for consolidated pretrial proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. These…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. DiCarlo v. St. Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  3. Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Johnson v. PanettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. In Re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Lit.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API