Legal Opinion
Lucas v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 14, 1995No. 82265PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUMMERS, Justice.
Lucas and the Bishops were parties to a written contract for deed. Lucas, the seller, brought an action in the District Court against the Bishops.1 He alleged that he was entitled to accelerate the unmatured future installment payments, recover them plus interest and attorney’s fees, and foreclose against the property. The Bishops moved for summary judgment. Their motion was sustained, and the. trial court also granted attorney’s fees and costs to the defendants.
The only issue at this stage of the appeal is whether the plaintiff’s appeal was timely…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Salyer v. National Trailer Convoy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Mansell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Bushert v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Bushert v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Lucas v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Lucas v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.