Legal Opinion

Mansell v. City of Lawton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1994No. 82589PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

The trial judge sustained a motion to dismiss, and a judge-signed minute to that effect was filed that same day on October 7, 1993. A journal entry of judgment was then filed on October 15, 1993. The petition in error was filed on Monday, November 15, 1993. Appellee moves to dismiss for untimeliness.

Effective October 1, 1993, a minute entry is not an appealable order. 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.2(C). That statute, which took effect that date, states in part:

The following shall not constitute a judgment, decree or appealable order: A minute entry; verdict; informal statement of…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. McMillian v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. PAYNE v. KERNSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Mansell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Corbit v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Brown v. Green Country Softball Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API