Legal Opinion
Bushert v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 20, 1996No. 85395Published
1Opinion of the Court
912 P.2d 334 (1996)
Benny G. BUSHERT, Appellee,
v.
Loyd HUGHES, d/b/a Perry Auto Repair, Appellant.
No. 85395.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
February 20, 1996.
Carolyn S. Smith, Ponca City, Vicky J. Maine, Perry, for appellant.
David R. Barnes, Oklahoma City, for appellee.
OPALA, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
The issues which Bushert's quest for the appeal's dismissal tenders are: (1) If the losing party's lawyer assists in the preparation of the order disposing of the matter taken under advisement, does such participation require counsel to monitor the case filings in the court clerk's office for the occurrence…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.