Legal Opinion
A.M. Classic Construction, Inc. v. Tri-Build Development Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1999No. B114773PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J. *
J.*Appellants Tri-Build Development Company (Tri-Build) and Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (Santa Monica) appeal from a judgment confirming an amended arbitration award in favor of respondent A.M. Classic Construction, Inc. (A.M. Classic). Appellants contend that the arbitrator exceeded his powers by amending the award to determine an issue he inadvertently neglected to decide. They contend the trial court was required to vacate the amended award and order the entire dispute reheard by a new arbitrator. We conclude arbitrators have the authority to amend an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Banks v. Milwaukee Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Roehl v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Century City Med. Plaza v. Sperling, Isaacs & EisenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Maaso v. SignerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.