Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Newman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1984No. 2837PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Following trial by jury, Edward Newman was acquitted on a charge of riot 1 but convicted of recklessly endangering another person 2 and disorderly conduct. 3 Post-trial motions were denied, and Newman was sentenced to pay total fines of $2,000.00 and to serve consecutive periods of probation totalling three years. On direct appeal, Newman’s principal argument is that videotape evidence established incontrovertible physical facts and that, therefore, the trial court erred (1) when it denied a defense request for a directed verdict and (2) when it refused to instruct the jury that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  3. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. McCombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BowserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. FullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. WhetstineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API