Legal Opinion

Horen v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1922No. Appeals, Nos. 181 and 182PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

Defendant appeals from the refusal to enter judgments in his behalf notwithstanding the verdicts in plaintiffs’ favor.

Louis Horen, the minor plaintiff, lived with his father on Third Street, Philadelphia, near the right-angled grade crossing of this street by the railroad operated by defendant which runs along and in the bed of Oregon Avenue. The testimony of the boy and his minor sister shows he left his home on the afternoon of April 5,1918, to purchase candy at a store across Oregon Avenue. When he reached the railroad crossing, he was instantly struck by an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Hill v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. SchwindlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Seiwell v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Glancy v. McKees Rocks BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cubitt v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Snyder v. Penn Liberty Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Hojecki v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Reidinger v. Lewis Jones, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Scales v. Majestic Steam LaundryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API