United States v. Eisenbeis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington. Tlie writ of error herein brings before this court the proceedings had in the case of the United States against Eisenbeis et al. in tlie United States district court in'and for the district of Washington, and also certain proceedings had in the gtate court in Jefferson county, state of Washington, in tlie suit of Charles Eisenbeis and Kate Eisenbeis, plaintiffs in…
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington. Tlie writ of error herein brings before this court the proceedings had in the case of the United States against Eisenbeis et al. in tlie United States district court in'and for the district of Washington, and also certain proceedings had in the gtate court in Jefferson county, state of Washington, in tlie suit of Charles Eisenbeis and Kate Eisenbeis, plaintiffs in error herein, against B. M. Long, Clementine Long, and Francis L. Bash, defendants in error herein. The facts relating to…
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
The arguments of counsel covered a wide, range of legal principles, and innumerable authorities were cited by them in support of their respective views. The various assignments of error herein are based upon the action of the United States court in sustaining the demurrer to the answer of the plaintiffs in error, and raise the question as to the jurisdiction of the respective courts, national and state, in the various proceedings set forth in the statement of facts concerning the subject-matter of the controversy between the parties. The contention of the plaintiffs in error, as claimed by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- City of St. Paul v. Certain Lands in City of St. Paul, Minn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. CrowellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1917
- Kansas City Gas Co. v. Kansas CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.