Pitt v. Rodgers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court oí the United States for the District of ífevada.
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court of the United States for the district of Nevada (96 Fed. 668) restraining W. C. Pitt, J. T. Hauskins, and L. L. Downs from farther proceeding against Arthur Rodgers, the complainant in this action, upon an amended and supplemental answer filed by them “in a certain action' pending in the district court, Fifth judicial district of the state of Nevada, in and for the county of Humboldt, wherein J. R. Thies, P. N. Marker, and H. C. Marker are plaintiffs, and the said W. C. Pitt, J. T. Hauskins, and L. L. Downs are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- French v. HaySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Schuehle v. . ReimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Head v. FordyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. University of ChicagoUnited States Circuit Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- O'Neil v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Morrow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- United States v. EisenbeisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.