Miller & Lux v. Rickey
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
In Equity. On exceptions to answer, demurrers to bill and cross-bills, and motion for injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
In the multitude of questions involved in these cases it will be the endeavor of the court to group them together, as far as possible, under one general head. There are, however, certain motions and demurrers relating exclusively to the case of Miller & Lux v. Rickey et al. (C. C.) No. 731, 123 Fed. 604, 127 Fed. 573, which will first be disposed of. The general nature and character of this suit may be briefly stated as one in tort to obtain an injunction restraining the defendants from diverting the waters of Walker river above complainant’s lands to its prejudice. No…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Eyster v. GaffSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mineral County v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERV.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Carter Oil Co. v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.